Siemens plc training
- 5 Comment
It is good that some people at least have the decency to answer the question and said that Siemens Simatic very difficult and complex compared to other languages.
![]() |
It is interesting to learn that Step 7 is a powerful, but difficult. It seems that similar strength C and the simplicity of Visual Basic.
Just because I understand does not mean that you are smarter than everyone, and everyone is stupid. Your answer in consulting services and solutions to the problem. Why can not you just a few examples and manuals? Why not just me in Detroit when I was in LA and for me because I lost the card, because I do not try hard enough?
![]() |
In my experience, intelligent people who understand only certain skills and concepts in general, the teachers terrible. They look like you an idiot, if they are able to communicate and learn what they are missing so easy to understand. In fact, we can all learn from these concepts.
is an easy way to understand what it is not easy. Part of the problem with examples is that the complexity, some would say, requires different styles of programming. There is no way the programs and bind together. And not many small, easy to understand, for example. These controls are typically used for large and complex problems.
![]() |
What manuals, commissioned by the Siemens website, many of them, and can be downloaded free. There are no “Step 7 for Dummies” type that I am aware, but I regret it very difficult. In some respects, what you say is exactly what we tried to use the product is not very accessible and has a difficult learning curve. Best help I can give is that some C and assembler programming experience great help in understanding the concepts that are issued by the automation programmer.
![]() |
This is not true, lively, or evasive, the simple fact that you are familiar with some very low level, thehardware level, methods and concepts in the field for what they do is meaningful. I’m sorry it is not easy, but it is.
“S7″ mark are not you something about the programming language used. S7-200 series have no relation to S7-300/400 lines more or less the same grayplastic.
I understand that they sell in many markets S7-200 product is better than S7-300/400 line several times. This means that it sells more than in proportion to the number of units. Measuring sales in euro could give a different result, since different S7-300/400 price as S7-200.
S7-200 was developed by a team around the time TI, where Siemens PLC bought a TI-developed department. It is a fairly conventional “Japanese” stylePLC with IEC solutions. If you’ve ever programmed Omron or Koyo PLC, would you feel comfortable with S7-200. Both TI and Siemens used (and as GE and GE-Fanuc), resell marked Koyo PLC. S7-200 is a substitute for a niche product (sales of Siemens, Koyo PLC, Koyo and began direct sales automation Direct).
S7-300/400 (300 and 400 are essentially the same except for the packaging and I / O rack format) are designed as direct replacement for S5 Series. S5 series is the mainstay for many years, to Siemens S7 300/400, and offer upgrades to customers. S5 and S7-300/400 incompatible hardware and software, is not 100% compatible, but overwrite the old S5 program S7 is relatively easy to run 300/400. Siemens also has a conversion program, which is about 80% - 90% success rate for simple programs.
S5 is an old model, who was a contemporary of AB-2-PLC and PLC-5. S5 is the Intel 8031 series of microprocessors, which Siemens has licensed the production is based. They also own a coprocessor, which is used in some models S5 gear single Boolean logic. Siemens pressed overwhelming number of features from simple 8-bit processor. Punishment for this, however, that a statement S5 was very primitive and only slightly higher than the 8031 assembler. Look at the 8031 assembly and S5 Instruction List (IL), and you see the similarities.
In contrast, AB has a different approach and use the mini-computer technology in their designs early PLC. Early PLC2S used 4 processors AMD 2900 bit slice to a separate 16-bit processor. It was expensive in terms of hardware, but they had fewer restrictions in the software caused.
Related posts:






…
Видел уже где то…
…
Спс …
…
Хм …
…
Хм …
…
Хм …